The Man Who Rivaled Jonah

Don't fight a whale, because you'll lose, you stupid human.

      Off the coast of England on August 25th, 1891 something extraordinary happened…supposedly. A crew of a whaling ship known as the Star of the East was trying to capture a school of sperm whales when one of the whales became very angry and crushed one of the smaller whaling boats in half with his jaw. The sailors on the boat attempted to flee to safety, but one sailor was much less lucky than the rest. Steersman James Bartley was swallowed whole by the whale and as such his fellow crew members believed him to be dead. The rest of the crew managed to get to safety and later found the same whale dead in the water. Initially they did not realize that it was the same whale, but once it occurred to them that it could be, they cut open the belly of the whale and found Bartley inside, still alive. The steersman was in very bad condition. Not only was he having extreme hallucinations, but his skin garnered a purplish hue, a horrifying site for his fellow crew members to witness. Soon the men had Bartley cleaned up and back on English soil. Bartley as well as the rest of the crew of the Star of the East told of their experience under oath, with the hopes that it would be more believable to the general public (Snow, 126-8). According to Edward Rowe Snow’s account of the story the only lasting effect that Bartley suffered as a result of this incident was “a recurring nightmare in which he relived his sensation in a whale’s stomach” (Snow, 128).

      Yes. You did in fact read that correctly. A man got swallowed whole by a whale, survived for days inside of said whale, and then lived to tell the tale. Absurd, I know, but what is the significance of this story? The answer to this question can be found in a fantastic article written by Dr. Edward B. Davis entitled “A Whale of a Tale: Fundamentalist Fish Stories.” Dr. Davis took a deep dive into this story in order to find if there was any truth to it and discovered that it is in fact all lies. However, Dr. Davis points out a very important point that “If there is no truth in the Bartley story itself, there is still much to be learned from the story of the story…” (234). The excellent research conducted by Dr. Davis has brought many important facts to light, such as the truth that the Star of the East was not a whaling ship and that Bartley was never a crew member of the brig. Dr. Davis also learned that there was a whale in 1891 known as the Gorleston whale that,

“ran up against a pier off the town of Gorleston, just south of Great Yarmouth. It was soon pursued by several boats and, after numerous attempts to harpoon it with fishing gear, it ran aground and was killed. Hung up by a rope around its tail, the whale was placed on exhibit for two days, drawing 2200 folk curious enough to pay an admission charge” (228).

The fame of this particular whale, Davis believes, inspired James Bartley, whoever he may be, to come up with a story to profit off of. Davis paints a picture saying,

“Suppose there was at that time an imaginative young man, let’s call him James Bartley, who happened one day to see this whale and to read a newspaper account of its capture and disembowelment. As he reflected upon this monster from the deep his thoughts moved to consider the plight of Jonah, and Gorleston whale. Having been graced by nature with an unusual complexion, he might easily pass for Jonah himself, so much so that he becomes a circus side show in the spirit of the Gorleston whale, billing himself as “The Jonah of the Twentieth Century.” He also spins a yarn, complete with a real ship that really was in the South Atlantic in February 1891 in case anyone should make inquiries, that is printed by at least one provincial newspaper just two months after the story of the Gorleston whale. Perhaps he even has a friend pose as the captain of this vessel (who is, conveniently enough, not named in the original accounts) to attest to those facts that a man who spent thirty hours inside a whale’s belly could not have known about” (233). 

The question then arises, who in 1891 would believe this story? How could James Bartley profit off such a ludicrous tale? The answer to this revolves around a story older than most, Jonah and the Whale.

      Jonah and the Whale is a Biblical story of a man who was swallowed by a whale, lived inside of said whale for three days, and was then spit out on to dry land safe and sound. In the late nineteenth century, the idea of the Bible as not being completely historically accurate was gaining popularity and preachers were attempting to prove the accuracy of the Bible by any means necessary. This particular story was “living proof of the veracity of scripture against the onslaught of the scientists and the higher critics…” who did not believe in the words of the Bible as absolute truth (Davis, 234). Preachers at the time “wanted more than anything else to give people reasons to believe, to strengthen their faith in the gospels by strengthening their faith in the literal words of the Bible, to debunk the claims of atheistic scientists and apostate theologians” (Davis, 234). This story gave them the opportunity to do so. James Bartley, if that was even his real name, was probably just a guy who knew how to manipulate people, and as such has left an interesting mark on history. He may not be a biblical prophet like Jonah, but he certainty made an historical impact for the ages.

Sources

Davis, Edward. “A Whale of a Tale: Fundamentalist Fish Stories.” Perspectives on science and Christian faith: journal of the American Scientific Affiliation 43 (1991): 224-237. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320170620_A_Whale_of_a_Tale_Fundamentalist_Fish_Stories.

Snow, Edward Rowe. Mysteries and Adventures Along the Atlantic Coast. Updated by Jeremy D’Entremont. Forward by Joseph E. Garland. 1948. Reprint, Carlisle, MA: Commonwealth Editions, 2004.

Images

Map